|
|||||||||
MENUHOMEDAILY BRIEF LATEST POSTS J.M. BERGER ISIS: STATE OF TERROR JIHAD JOE LINKSBlogs of WarHizballah Cavalcade Internet Haganah Jihadology Jihadica Kremlin Trolls Making Sense of Jihad Selected Wisdom Views from the Occident TAGSAmerican TerroristsAnwar Awlaki Al Qaeda AQAP American Al Qaeda Members Inspire Magazine Revolution Muslim OKBOMB |
News, documents and analysis on violent extremismTuesday, August 15, 2017
Calling Them Nazis
There’s an increasingly common argument online against referring
to the alt-right by its chosen name. “Call them Nazis” is the refrain. If you
haven’t said it yourself, you’ve probably seen other people saying it.
While this approach may be understandable and may suit certain rhetorical purposes, it’s
a grave mistake for journalists and experts who substantively study and cover the movement to embrace
this approach.
The alt-right category is extremely important to
understanding what’s happening in this movement. Nazis are only part of this movement, or more correctly neo-Nazis, since most of them aren't German nationalists. If neo-Nazis were America’s only
problem, it would be a much smaller problem.
The alt-right encompasses a variety of right-wing and white
supremacist movements, from conspiracists to the KKK. No single movement under the
alt-right umbrella is especially large or effectively mobilized. No single movement under the alt-right umbrella can turn out the
hundreds of adherents necessary to command headlines with an action short of terrorism.
Rejecting the alt-right label might make you feel better,
but it unproductively obscures the primary element that makes it work as a movement—its
ability to unite disparate radical groups with differing beliefs and tactics into
a single amorphous community that is capable of coordinated action. Understand this: If the alt-right movement consisted only of neo-Nazis, we would not be talking about it.
In the fight against the Islamic State, the semantics of “what
to call them” dominated a lot of policy discussion in stupid ways. The Obama
administration generally argued that using the group’s self-appointed name
somehow legitimized its aspiration. Opponents of the group spent years referring
to it as ISIL or Daesh, with no quantifiable impact on the group’s success or
failure.
You can call the alt-right whatever names you like. Express your disdain, it's fine. But those of us who are doing serious work on this issue need to use a label with more analytical utility. The alt-right is meaningfully different from the right-wing movements that preceded it. To understand its appeal and counter its influence, we need to understand it as a distinct category and acknowledge those differences. Books by J.M. Berger: ISIS: The State of Terror by Jessica Stern and J.M. Berger. Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam Views expressed on INTELWIRE are those of the author alone.
Tweets referencing this post:loading..
|
BOOKS"...smart, granular analysis..."ISIS: The State of TerrorMore on ISIS: The State of Terror "...a timely warning...""At a time when some politicians and pundits blur the line between Islam and terrorism, Berger, who knows this subject far better than the demagogues, sharply cautions against vilifying Muslim Americans. ... It is a timely warning from an expert who has not lost his perspective." -- New York Times More on Jihad Joe ABOUT![]() RECENTNewest posts!Extremist Construction of Identity INTELWIRE Resources on Right-Wing and Racist Extre... What's in a Name, Redux Interactive Map: KKK Flyer Drops, 2015-2016 The International Banks Conspiracy, Explained Nazis vs. ISIS on Twitter 15 Years of Terror -- PBS Nova The Social Apocalypse: A Forecast Al Nusra Splits From Al Qaeda: What It Means Making CVE Work EXCLUSIVESNew York Pipe Bomb Suspect Linked to Revolution Muslim The Utility of Lone Wolves Interview with Online Jihadist Abu Suleiman Al Nasser A Way Forward for CVE: The Five Ds How Terrorists Use The Internet: Just Like You PATCON: The FBI's Secret War on the Militia Movement Interview About Jihad With Controversial Cleric Bilal Philips Forgeries on the Jihadist Forums U.S. Gave Millions To Charity Linked To Al Qaeda, Anwar Awlaki State Department Secretly Met With Followers of Blind Sheikh State Department Put 'Political Pressure' On FBI To Deport Brother-in-Law Of Osama Bin Laden In 1995 FBI Records Reveal Details Of Nixon-Era Racial Profiling Program Targeting Arabs Gaza Flotilla Official Was Foreign Fighter in Bosnia War U.S. Had 'High Confidence' Of UBL Attack In June 2001 Behind the Handshake: The Rumsfeld-Saddam Meeting |