|
|||||||||
MENUHOMEDAILY BRIEF LATEST POSTS J.M. BERGER ISIS: STATE OF TERROR JIHAD JOE LINKSBlogs of WarHizballah Cavalcade Internet Haganah Jihadology Jihadica Kremlin Trolls Making Sense of Jihad Selected Wisdom Views from the Occident TAGSAmerican TerroristsAnwar Awlaki Al Qaeda AQAP American Al Qaeda Members Inspire Magazine Revolution Muslim OKBOMB |
News, documents and analysis on violent extremismWednesday, September 11, 2013
An Open Letter to Jihadis on the Anniversary of September 11 #ذكرى_11سبتمبر
Dear jihadis:
I’ve spent some years now reading what you write and say to
each other, and talking to you directly from time to time. I’ve been thinking about
those conversations a lot, and I have a few things I want to say.
I think most of you are trying to do the right thing. Sure,
some of you are jerks, sometimes very violent and homicidal jerks (and you
don’t have a monopoly on that). But I believe many of you, perhaps most, get
involved with jihadi movements because you genuinely care about the welfare of
Muslims and about doing the right thing according to the dictates of your
religion and individual consciences.
That doesn’t mean I agree with you on the issues, or how you
see the world, or the values you hold, or the logic of your position. I’m not
trying to mislead you. We’re miles and miles apart on almost every imaginable
issue having to do with culture or politics. In fact, I downright hate a lot of
what you represent.
Nevertheless, I want to tell you a few things about how I
see your movement and your current situation.
I think you should think about finding ways to exercise your
consciences without engaging in an endless, aimless war with the West that you
stand no chance of winning. So far, your actions have been suicidal for you
personally and immensely damaging to your global Ummah.
Contrary to what you might think, no serious-minded person in
the West believes that you should be forcibly prohibited from pursuing your
religion and your political beliefs. We may not agree with your values, but we
believe even more in self-determination, the right of peoples in the world to
choose their own path.
It is not what you believe, but how you pursue those beliefs,
that leads to conflict between us. Al Qaeda’s ideas guide your movement, and
the philosophy of Al Qaeda (unlike that of Islam) is based entirely on destruction.
This ideology is best expressed in the “Constants
on the Path of Jihad,” a text famously interpreted by Anwar Awlaki, which
boils down to one simple idea: “If you’re winning, the strategy is kill, and if
you’re losing, the strategy is kill.”
“Constants” states – explicitly – that the outcome of your
actions doesn’t matter. Win, lose, help people, hurt people, it’s all the same
to Al Qaeda.
"As long as there is slaughtering, we're with them. If
there's no slaughtering, there's none, that's it. Buzz off," as one
member of your movement put it, in an unguarded moment. The only real
constant is death.
That argument is not only unreligious, it’s insane. It
causes you to pursue killing instead of building a stable foundation for your
beliefs and your community.
As we say in the West, “If all you have is a hammer, every
problem looks like a nail.”
Your reactions to the situation in Egypt are a perfect
illustration of this problem. Within hours of the Muslim Brotherhood’s fall
from power, you guys were drooling with excitement. It’s proof, you tweeted
furiously, that democracy doesn’t work for Muslims.
I was actually glad to see these comments. If you want to
hold democracy to performance-based standards, I’m totally fine with that. But first,
you have to hold yourself to the same standards. Before you argue Egypt proves
“more jihad” is needed, first check to see whether “more jihad” has succeeded.
Anywhere. Ever.
Where are your success stories? I’m not talking about body
counts. Let’s just agree you’re good at that. But where have you made life
better for anyone? Where have jihadis created a society that is good for
Muslims?
After the Soviets left Afghanistan, the country was dragged
down by civil war and then under the Taliban’s cruel and brutal regime, starved
and demoralized, and eventually demolished because it granted safe haven to
Al Qaeda.
In Bosnia, you committed atrocities and accomplished the
unthinkable – you actually gave the Serbs a bargaining chip in international
negotiations. The Dayton pact that ended the war had to include a
requirement that you all leave Bosnia.
You reduced Iraq to rubble, killing thousands of Muslim
civilians, and you’re still doing it even though the United States has left the
country, hundreds
dead during this year’s Ramadan alone. How is that helping Muslims?
In Somalia, you weren’t even content to simply kill Muslims,
you killed mujahideen. After you destroyed the basic necessities of life and starved
the Muslims by obstructing aid shipments during a historic
drought, you began killing your
own fighters and religious leaders solely to feed the ego of Al Shabab’s insane
emir, Ahmed Godane.
On September 11, 2001, you carelessly killed Muslims right
alongside American civilians and called down ruination on Afghanistan. In Boston, you planted a bomb at the feet of
an eight-year-old
boy, then published magazines to brag about
it.
What has any of this accomplished?
You have not made Muslims safer in any country where you
operate. You haven’t made them healthier, wealthier or more powerful. You’ve
made them poor, scared and dead. And
this is the key point – you claim to want to defend and protect Muslims. Most
of you claim that is your primary goal in taking up the black banner. But look
at what you have accomplished – or more accurately what you have failed to
accomplish. And ask yourself whether you can find a better way.
It’s not difficult to see when people are suffering. It’s
not difficult to see when your towns and cities have been reduced to smoldering
rubble, by your
own forces at least as often as by your self-appointed
enemies.
Is that what Islam dictates for Muslims? Poverty, suffering and
pointless death?
I don’t think most of you believe that. I think you do what
you do because you think it will make the world a better, safer place for
Muslims to live good lives.
But any idiot can see that you are failing. Spectacularly.
I won’t lie to you. I think the ultimate, best solution to
your problem, and our problem with you, would be for you to stay home, raise
happy, healthy families and try to build vibrant, loving, inclusive, productive
communities.
If it were not so sad, I would laugh at those who literally abandon
their own families to hardship and poverty in order to theoretically defend the
families of others. I heard that argument from Omar Hammami, the American who ran
out on his wife and baby in order to join Al Shabab and defend Somali Muslims. He took two wives there and abandoned them too, to an even worse fate than enduring a deadbeat dad. Poor
Omar, who has now killed more mujahideen than he has “crusaders.”
The religious mandate you profess to believe is not about
killing for killing’s sake. Your actions can be meaningful only in the context
of greater goals – goals for the welfare of Muslims and of Islam. If you never
make any progress toward those goals, and you know it, but you keep killing
anyway, you’re nothing more than murderers.
Some of you will point toward metaphysical rewards, toward
ajr and houris. If your motivation is the promise of virgins in the life to
come, there’s probably nothing I can say to change your mind. You see God as the ultimate capitalist, a
vending machine who coughs up treats as long as you put in the right
combination of coins. You don’t care if you’re doing good, as long as you get
what’s coming to you.
I hope that most of you are smarter than that. If a just God
does indeed reward people in the afterlife, those rewards are reserved for the
just – not for the selfish and misguided who mindlessly spread misery because
they think it means God will owe them something.
In my conversations with you online, I see a growing
contingent of jihadis who are fundamentally uncomfortable with terrorism per
se, with its intentional targeting of civilians, including women and children,
and with the bloody, ugly spectacle of it all. I see a desire among many of you
to express your convictions in a manner that is more clear and defensible from
a moral perspective.
In country after country, you have repeated the same basic
approach: Foreign fighters with an explicitly jihadist philosophy rush to join
battle in a foreign land, and the first thing they do is put themselves on a
pedestal.
In Bosnia, your propaganda videos boasted that the first
task for the mujahideen was to “correct” the beliefs of Bosnians, even as they
suffered under a genocidal attack and before lifting a hand to defend them.
This is madness, and it is stupidity, but most of all, it is
arrogance.
When you go to “help” people in foreign lands, you
immediately start punishing them for failing to meet your standards. You harass
and even kill local Muslims whose beliefs do not align with your own.
Arrogance defines your movement, above all else. You refuse
to acknowledge doubts, or to evaluate how your actions affect others. You
refuse to admit when you are obviously failing at the task you claim is
all-important.
You believe you perfectly understand all the politics of the
world, but God did not promise you infallibility. And although you are
imperfect humans, you believe without a shadow of a doubt that you perfectly
understand what God expects from you.
If you
hear nothing else I say, hear this: Arrogance is and will always be your
downfall. Until you learn to question your assumptions, you will never be able
to correct your mistakes. Until you find humility, you cannot help anyone.
For you, perhaps, and for us, and mostly, I hope, for the
many innocent Muslims whose lives have been terribly, tragically disrupted by
your actions so far, I hope you can learn that lesson. Before you destroy what’s
left of your lands, your wealth and your lives.
J.M.
Views expressed on INTELWIRE are those of the author alone.
Tweets referencing this post:loading..
|
BOOKS"...smart, granular analysis..."ISIS: The State of TerrorMore on ISIS: The State of Terror "...a timely warning...""At a time when some politicians and pundits blur the line between Islam and terrorism, Berger, who knows this subject far better than the demagogues, sharply cautions against vilifying Muslim Americans. ... It is a timely warning from an expert who has not lost his perspective." -- New York Times More on Jihad Joe ABOUT![]() RECENTNewest posts!Loopcast: AQ since 2008 Yellow and Black is the New Black Flag Reflections of a Troll What "The Wolverine" Can Teach Us About Lone Wolf ... A Modest Test of Terrorism Forecasting with Google... Weeks Before Assassination, Bhutto Complained to U... 2007 State Department Intelligence Report: Who Kil... Eric Harroun, Indictment and Affidavit in Support ... Understanding NSA Data Collection and Locations I appeared on a Google Hangout to discuss online r... EXCLUSIVESNew York Pipe Bomb Suspect Linked to Revolution Muslim The Utility of Lone Wolves Interview with Online Jihadist Abu Suleiman Al Nasser A Way Forward for CVE: The Five Ds How Terrorists Use The Internet: Just Like You PATCON: The FBI's Secret War on the Militia Movement Interview About Jihad With Controversial Cleric Bilal Philips Forgeries on the Jihadist Forums U.S. Gave Millions To Charity Linked To Al Qaeda, Anwar Awlaki State Department Secretly Met With Followers of Blind Sheikh State Department Put 'Political Pressure' On FBI To Deport Brother-in-Law Of Osama Bin Laden In 1995 FBI Records Reveal Details Of Nixon-Era Racial Profiling Program Targeting Arabs Gaza Flotilla Official Was Foreign Fighter in Bosnia War U.S. Had 'High Confidence' Of UBL Attack In June 2001 Behind the Handshake: The Rumsfeld-Saddam Meeting |