MENU

HOME

DAILY BRIEF

LATEST POSTS

J.M. BERGER

ISIS: STATE OF TERROR

JIHAD JOE

LINKS

Blogs of War

Hizballah Cavalcade

Internet Haganah

Jihadology

Jihadica

Kremlin Trolls

Making Sense of Jihad

Selected Wisdom

Views from the Occident

TAGS

American Terrorists

Anwar Awlaki

Al Qaeda

AQAP

American Al Qaeda Members

Inspire Magazine

Revolution Muslim

OKBOMB


News, documents and analysis on violent extremism


Sunday, June 21, 2015
 

A definition of terrorism

For the record, my definition of terrorism:
Public violence targeting noncombatants, carried out by nongovernmental individuals or groups, in order to advance a political or ideological goal or amplify a political or ideological message.
The objective of this definition is to draw lines around a relatively consistent phenomenon, which has similar characteristics no matter who the perpetrators are, and to distinguish it from phenomena that have similar traits but are fundamentally different in conception and goal. 

Employing a consistent definition is useful for distinguishing how and why we respond to certain kinds of violence and removing certain biases (for instance, race and religion) that can make us less effective at countering terrorism as well as aggravating broader social problems. 

The key components of this definition are:
  • Violence is public: Terrorism is is usually theatrical and is done to influence an audience. The word "terrorism" itself comes from the effect it is perceived to have on the audience, but these days, it is used for more than just fear. For instance, ISIS uses terrorism to provoke and enrage.
  • Targets noncombatants: This includes both civilians and undeployed military personnel. Terrorist tactics can be used to fight deployed military personnel, but this is generally defined as insurgency or guerrilla warfare.
  • Violence is not attributed to government: This distinguishes between terrorism and state actions under its monopoly on violence, or war. This does not excuse state violence, it just reclassifies it. When a state uses violence against noncombatants, it can be an act of war, or a war crime. Against its own population, it can be genocide, oppression or tyranny. "Not attributed" matters here, as some terrorism is state-sponsored. It is possible to imagine an overtly state-directed terrorist campaign against an adversary (the question of ISIS's state status is obviously relevant), but this is relatively rare and should probably be thought of in a war context. 
  • Has political or ideological motive: This distinguishes an attack like Fort Hood or Charleston from being considered simply a mass shooting incident. It also distinguishes hate crimes sparked by uncomplex (i.e., nonideological) racism (such as a deadly fight with a longtime neighbor, or with a stranger in a bar, with an element of bias related to race or sexual orientation) from crimes designed to have a wider political impact. 

Buy the new book ISIS: The State of Terror by Jessica Stern and J.M. Berger. 

Buy J.M. Berger's seminal book on American jihadists, Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam


Views expressed on INTELWIRE are those of the author alone.


     



     

Tweets referencing this post:

loading..



BOOKS

"...smart, granular analysis..."

ISIS: The State of Terror
"Jessica Stern and J.M. Berger's new book, "ISIS," should be required reading for every politician and policymaker... Their smart, granular analysis is a bracing antidote to both facile dismissals and wild exaggerations... a nuanced and readable account of the ideological and organizational origins of the group." -- Washington Post

More on ISIS: The State of Terror

"...a timely warning..."

Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam:
"At a time when some politicians and pundits blur the line between Islam and terrorism, Berger, who knows this subject far better than the demagogues, sharply cautions against vilifying Muslim Americans. ... It is a timely warning from an expert who has not lost his perspective." -- New York Times

More on Jihad Joe

ABOUT

INTELWIRE is a web site edited by J.M. Berger. a researcher, analyst and consultant covering extremism, with a special focus on extremist activities in the U.S. and extremist use of social media. He is a non-resident fellow with the Brookings Institution, Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World, and author of the critically acclaimed Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam, the only definitive history of the U.S. jihadist movement, and co-author of ISIS: The State of Terror with Jessica Stern.

RECENT

Newest posts!

INTELWIRE Weekly Brief, 6/19/15, Charleston, Wuhay...

INTELWIRE Weekly Brief 6/12/15: NYT on Kremlin Tro...

INTELWIRE Weekly Brief, 6/5/15, Al Nusra Evolves, ...

INTELWIRE Weekly Brief, 5/30/2015

Weekly Brief 5/22/2015, Bin Laden's Bookshelf, Is ...

INTELWIRE Weekly Brief, 5/15/2015: Return of the S...

Review Roundup -- ISIS: The State of Terror

INTELWIRE Weekly Brief, 5/7/2015: Senate Hearing o...

Social Media: An Evolving Front in Radicalization

Elton Simpson 2010 indictment and documents

EXCLUSIVES


New York Pipe Bomb Suspect Linked to Revolution Muslim

The Utility of Lone Wolves

Interview with Online Jihadist Abu Suleiman Al Nasser

A Way Forward for CVE: The Five Ds

How Terrorists Use The Internet: Just Like You

PATCON: The FBI's Secret War on the Militia Movement

Interview About Jihad With Controversial Cleric Bilal Philips

Forgeries on the Jihadist Forums

U.S. Gave Millions To Charity Linked To Al Qaeda, Anwar Awlaki

State Department Secretly Met With Followers of Blind Sheikh

State Department Put 'Political Pressure' On FBI To Deport Brother-in-Law Of Osama Bin Laden In 1995

FBI Records Reveal Details Of Nixon-Era Racial Profiling Program Targeting Arabs

Gaza Flotilla Official Was Foreign Fighter in Bosnia War

U.S. Had 'High Confidence' Of UBL Attack In June 2001

Behind the Handshake: The Rumsfeld-Saddam Meeting